Posted at 10.09.2018
The mere mention of Napoleon Bonaparte stirs thoughts. He was indeed one of the 'greatest military intellects' in the history of warfare. The situations of his life have fuelled the imaginations of historians, literary information, commanding officers, filmmakers and students as well. Both the never-ending praise and profound criticisms heaped on this iconic physique have added significantly to the enlargement of the Napoleonic legend.
Napoleon possessed an unbelievable selection of intellectual capacity. His powers of concentration were gigantic as was his recollection for details and facts. This insatiable thirst and potential to absorb knowledge provided him the ability to work for very long periods continually. Standing of them costing only 5'2" he was a brilliant military strategist who was simply both respected and feared. His genius place in the fact that he didn't revolutionize the warfare itself but excelled at refining the existing art. Drastic changes in reforms were not proposed; somewhat he hired new ways to make things work. Taking involvement in the smallest steps under his command line he used his mental capabilities to believe out military services problems days and nights or even months beforehand, a trait that proved very helpful on battle domains where he perplexed the opposing armies along with his armed forces strategies'. He always thought of various ways to approach employment or task accessible. Fusion of struggle with maneuver was his very best contribution to the fine art of war. Insisting on rate and mobility; the essential features of his advertising campaign, he introduced something of military corps with the capacity of holding off superior pushes until help appeared. He streamlined the system to achieve an increased degree of skills allowing for increased mobility and so greater edge over his competitors.
One thing that Napoleon was aware of was how to portray himself and his accomplishments, to his personal glory. He had a great capacity in propaganda, the fine art to getting the masses and elite to comprehend and support what he wanted these to. He skillfully used do it yourself campaign such as proclamations, bulletins and characters to government all written with his interests at heart. His campaigns in the eyes of the public became crusades of good against evil. He even proceeded to go as far as commissioning painters and offering awards for portraits and sculptures celebrating key occasions in his job. Truly a grasp manipulator, he strategically projected an idealized image of himself that he carefully created to match the purposes of his ambition.
As a leader, Napoleon first won the trust and commitment of his men; from the cheapest soldier to the best ranking general and aristocrats. Indeed his most significant strength, he accomplished this by encouraging them victory and glory. A charismatic loudspeaker with irresistible allure he could affect not only the ones that he led but also the ones that he didn't lead. An excellent motivator of people he realized that he had to fill the needs of the people first, in order to excite them enough about the art of war. This was the only way that they would have the love to complete succeeding missions.
An creativity to both Frenchmen and foreigners, Napoleon got the unique ability to persuade people to believe in his cause and adapt to his way of thinking. Thus he earned a substantial amount of reliability and favour simply by relating himself in warfare, particularly on the battlefield alongside his men. He never lost eyesight of his responsibility to get the job done. No job was beneath him and he had taken on tasks that can have easily been delegated to others. Within the eyes of these under his order this was extremely commendable. He made his military feel as though he was one of them and not above them and within place the indeterminable durability of his army. Napoleons military not only fought for France, they were entirely specialized in their commanding general rendering it impossible to avoid them. He recognized that he had to make others self-confident in his capacity to succeed this is the only path they would believe they placed the same ability.
Edgar Allen Pope said that "To vilify a great man is the readiest way in which a little man can himself attain greatness. " Napoleon was greatly aware of the impact of morale on modern warfare. He thought in the maxim, "Morale is to the physical as three is to 1. " and that, "Moral force alternatively than numbers, chooses victories. " Thus he produced something of honours and preferment, attractive to the troops "soul to be able to electrify the man. " Napoleon realized that showing gratitude was ways to gain the favor of the people. He paid military using the silver and gold he achieved from battles and created the Legion of Honor to prize the achievements of his military. Often he honoured the best or bravest soldier by removing his own medals or merits off his cover and putting them on the soldier's involved which 'distributed like wildfire' and inspired them all. He advertised those who performed well irrespective of their social backdrop. Hence, he inevitably associated the fortunes of his officials to his own continual success and maintenance of vitality. Letting his soldiers know every once in awhile how much they meant to the organization and exactly how much he appreciated their effort was a sure way to keep the respect and admiration of people. This guaranteed their total devotion and loyalty.
Towards the end of his empire however, Napoleons weaknesses became more visible. His once flat iron will considered stubbornness as he became enthusiastic about warfare and territorial acquisition. This insatiable lust for vitality caused ceaseless requirements on the sources of France. Troops were increased, so much so, that they truly became cumbersome to go and even more static. The scale of warfare increased and the key factor became firepower through the increasing size of men and in particular artillery. The end result was that the "one time God of fights was overthrown by the dynamics of warfare that he previously unleashed but failed to comprehend" He abandoned the principle of attention and destruction of armies. Underestimating his enemies, he set the path for his downfall. After being exiled to Elba he endured a lack of confidence and a deterioration of his physical health. This lack of confidence little by little trickled down to the military and resulted in defeat.
Some may claim that his main weakness lay down in the actual fact that he didn't know when to quit. His megalomaniac personality would not allow him to adapt to the changing form of war. As he became more powerful there was a growing distrust of those around him. He began to believe in things which acquired no truth. Always there have been spies listening to the conversations of people in Paris. Thus he did not empower the individuals around him to do more because they were constantly overlooking their shoulder blades. He pushed hard working men to follow too way too soon without doubting or allowing those around him to question enough the merits of certain decisions. Having no tolerance for liberty he attemptedto silence the talk of those around him. In doing this he limited the opinions he acquired about his command skills and exactly how well he was doing his job; stunting his potential for progress and improvement. His perception in his own future that he was placed apart from typical men warped his view and his amazingly inflated ego and controlling and overbearing aspect insisted on controlling and influencing all aspects of legislative agenda with a good grip. He needed to be involved in the development and execution of the program, failing woefully to delegate tasks, and empower both his staff and subordinates. This brought on the work of the staff to be uncoordinated often and low situational consciousness became a popular feature throughout the military. Failing as a political innovator he simply could not rule on a permanent basis. He set up new administrations and enforced constitutions to match them. The result was that none of them lasted for more than a few years. Control of the empire was unstable and uncontrollable because of his level of depth in providing advice and instructions. He made strategic failures of decisions to invade Spain and Russia and he angered the individuals he conquered along with his tyranny. In later promotions the fighting was seldom well been able when Napoleon didn't direct it personally. He insisted on micro-management of the military and put too much trust in his lieutenants many of whom weren't up to the duty of individual command when out with their master's gaze which proven extremely damaging.
Napoleon, the passage of time has not dimmed the power of his name. A century and a half after his death, Napoleon remains the greatest military genius of the modern world. In the immortal words of Napoleon, "Victory is one of the most persevering. The truest knowledge is a resolute persistence. " This is the frame of mind of Napoleon Bonaparte, a revolutionist, an excellent military strategist and a fearless soldier. Though many of his critics would explain him as a tyrant, a dictator -a ruthless, manipulative, driven man; to others "He simply embodied the ambitions of thirty million Frenchmen. ".