In this particular instance the individual whose personality will be reviewed and assessed is my own. To begin I am going to offer a brief overview of my personality as I see it, but this in a natural way comes with the disclaimer that my primary observations may be biased, especially due to the fact it is problematic for any person to view themselves objectively. From this point on I am going to also make reference to myself in the third-person (i. e. the subject) to maintain a certain amount of distance from the analysis.
In general, the subject's personality is having a mindful balance between extroversion and introversion. As the subject functions well in both social and isolated conditions, he will become irritable or weary when required to dwell in either extreme for too much time. In terms of social configurations, the subject displays an outgoing personality yet never looks for to dominate a conversation or room. He appears to be comfortable taking up a encouraging role, yet will consistently be an active participant in any situation. There could very well be a more serious part to the subject's personality as well. Especially in isolated or work conditions, the subject will become quieter and immensely focused on the situation at hand. When looked at in succession, the subject's activities in both of these settings seem to show a subtlety dual personality with regards to the particular setting where he is positioned. This does not seem to be always a faade on any type, but instead the subject's capability to conform, for a period of time, to any given situation. This supports the initial conclusion that the subject's personality is rather fluid and does not remain static over long periods of time. Yet these conclusions only stand for a personal judgment of the subject's personality and it is necessary to consider the topic in the light of professional psychological theories.
Perhaps one of the most well known ideas of personality psychology is the top Five, which bases its analysis on five different facets. The first category is "openness" and within this realm the topic would fall season on the lower end of the scale. While demonstrating intellectual interest, the subject will not show much desire for artistic or adventurous experiences. So while there is some extent of openness to new pursuits, the topic appears to limit his attention to a specific field, which reduces his "openness level". The next factor of "conscientiousness" can be more easily related to the subject. Generally in most situations, he will show a good deal of efficiency and screen a amount of foresight/planning. While spontaneity might show a determination to see new things, the topic prefers to arrange such things in advance. "Extraversion" is the cultural factor of the top Five and, as defined above, the topic seems to demonstrate both introversion and extroversion. With this thought, the subject's personality falls roughly in the center of this scale, exhibiting both a willingness to be outgoing and a desire to be by himself. The subject falls high on the "agreeableness" range, as he does not display a high amount of hostility in a communal setting. There's a natural competitiveness to his nature, but it remains completely in balance and is merely applied to appropriate situations. The subject's personality shows a desire to be on good terms with those around him, and he does not purposefully assess his peers without reason. In conditions of the ultimate category, "neuroticism", the topic is once again roughly in the middle of the scale. While he shows a good deal of confidence when joining a fresh situation, there are also particular cases that will easily anger him or cause him to become nervous. It really is difficult to determine which extreme is brought up frequently, but it is a fair assessment that the topic displays consistence self confidence aside from specific situation that draw out his ire or vulnerability. This is the basic evaluation of the subject's personality through the best Five system, but it will not be looked at the absolutely accurate assessment. While the Big Five is highly regarded as a theory, there are also other values about personality that offer alternate or more information.
Henry Murray's personality theory is the one that is not founded upon specific categories, but rather is centered on the fact that someone's personality is influenced with what they understand to be their desires and needs. When enjoying the subject's personality from this type of point of view, several new conclusions could be raised. In terms of the subject's life goals, it appears evident that he will not anticipate straying too much from the beaten avenue as they say. The lower rank on the "openness" level on the best Five would support the desire of this person to go after a career within society's norms. His involvement in intellectual pursuits would determine that his desire is to go into an educational or business focused career. This specific desire would force his personality away from works of extreme spontaneity or any element that could knock him off his chosen avenue. The subject's flip-flopping between extroversion and introversion could be predicated on his want to take up both extremes completely, but his lack of ability to take action. As he seems at home in both a communal and individual setting, the subject possibly comes with an innate desire to have both situations yet cannot or unwilling to chose a particular lifestyle. The subject's decision to stay as a supporting member of a discussion or of the team could, in Murray's model, indicate a desire to be an integral part of a team. Rather than lead or risk exclusion when you are too upfront with his personal opinion, the subject prefers to be an active yet subordinate person in a group. This may be construed as the subject's desire to conform, but that is too tough of a common sense and the greater accurate conclusion is the fact the topic has his own views and needs but prefers to address them subtly alternatively than aggressively. Murray's theory, specially when combined with the factors of the Big Five, help offer a view into the head of the subject and just why his personality is rolling out as it offers.
Seligman's theory of positive mindset can only add to the overall analysis of the subject's personality. This theory looks at the specific areas of someone's personality that are intended for promoting someone's happiness, an element that is often forgotten when examining psychology. The subject's personality is very aligned with the quest for knowledge, which is known as by Seligman to be always a basic part of human happiness. The subject chooses to constantly better himself by learning new ideas. This encourages his own pleasure by giving him a more informed and diverse view of the world. When combined with Murray's theory, it could be said that the subject's need to be happy has pressed his personality to be intellectually wondering as he identifies on a unconscious level that these educational pursuits make him a more happy person. This could also be applied to the actual fact that the topic is with the capacity of controlling his baser feelings (anger, dread, etc. ) in order that they are not commonly visible. This shows a degree of self-restraint that allows the subject to exist in just a comfortable and pleasurable social setting. There are a variety of Seligman's factors of positive psychology that the subject has not had enough life experience to fully be judged after (courage, mankind, etc. ). Nevertheless he does have a personality that may be seen through the lenses of positive mindset. There are areas of the subject's demeanor that can only be discussed when one considers that he acts this way to be able to promote pleasure for himself.
When these three mental health theories/viewpoints are put together, one gets a much deeper understanding of the subject's personality. If one decides to only use a specific theory, then you will see a more shallow assessment of this person and just how he acts. By using these three distinct theories the analysis was able to understand the essential factors of the subject's personality through the top Five, gauge the subject's wishes through Murray, and see how his personality is designed to allow for maximum enjoyment using Seligman's positive mindset. All three will vary approaches, nonetheless they can be blended and melded to permit for a well-rounded analysis. At the closing of this newspaper, it seems appropriate to once more mention that this kind of personality self-evaluation could be said to be extremely biased. They represent what I believe to be the most appropriate diagnosis of my personality, yet it is hard to judge yourself negatively or to confess any ulterior motives for the way you act. I have attempted to give the most fair and unbiased view as I could, but in the finish, there's a reason that individuals are assessed by outside psychologist/therapists somewhat than being still left to their own judgments.