It looks that my ethical platform may be slightly eclectic. Nonetheless, having occurred to read the articles on Deontology and Utilitarianism (Kay, 1997; "Deontological Ethics", 2008), I have come to the conclusion that my ethical framework generally revolves around the duty aspect of Deontology. Up to this point, I was struggling to put a name to my moral beliefs/value system. I recognized for sure though that my worth were strongly based on my experience as a Christian. I strongly believe rules are meant to be kept-not broken as is the commonly read expression. For me, life includes a couple of rules and duties-typical of your Deontologist. . I really believe firmly that one's duty is highly stipulated by Christ; for example, the "Great Commission", and the living a righteous life that is satisfying to God. Here's an example: i just was to complete some readings for one of my classes but I was unable to do all the readings as I had previously made plans to wait a function at church. When I attended the class, I considered the probability of being questioned directly about one of the articles which i had not read. Knowing that lying was not an option, I'd have (as is my moral responsibility) were required to inform my lecturer which i had been struggling to complete that one reading. Acquired my moral ideas revolved largely around Utilitarianism and Consequentialism, I'd have told a lie because it would have avoided me from being suspended from the workshop which could have afflicted my attendance ratio Thus at the end of the day, my ethical guidelines are incorporated with the whole idea of the 'Trinity' residing in me.
Now one may argue that it might be different if I had a member of family who was simply a homosexual or dedicated homosexual acts. I concur, it would be different. Actually, I would become more emotionally and spiritually invested which will be the precursor to more extreme prayer and fasting for your loved one. My Bible tips me to the 'availing electricity' of the "effectual and fervent prayer of the righteous" (James 5 verse 16). Therefore, based on the actual fact that I would hate to see my loved one delivered to hell, I'd be on my legs praying with the person's deliverance. As I noted before, there's a mixture of responsibilities and consequence. I have my Christian tasks that if not satisfied have great consequences for my soul. Additionally, I have as a 'new man in Christ' an understanding of God's specific orders, so it does not matter who the person is; that is, there is no agent-relativity.
Within my honest framework, I believe my primary moral basic principle revolves around the idea of "Doing unto others as you would have them do unto you. " In this principle, some of the rules that I subscribe to relate with a passage of Biblical scripture that want Christians to avoid judging and condemning others whilst ensuring that these are merciful and forgiving (St. Luke 6 verse 36-37, Ruler James Version). The thought of preventing judgement and condemnation does not imply that one is to simply accept or encourage an action that is not of God. The Bible provides specific guidelines as to what activities are condoned and prohibited. Thus, it is my responsibility to uphold the Religious regulations and bring the term to a non-Christian (St. Matthew 28 verse 18-20). Therefore, the concept regarding judgement and condemnation will not discord with the position I required with homosexuality (Romans 1 verse 24-32; 2 Corinthians 6 verse 8; 2 Thessalonians 3 verse 6).
I will give a further example of the principle regarding judgement and condemnation. I have lately found myself in a quandary whilst interacting with persons who aren't Christians. The most recent example was whilst getting together with a lecturer in category about Professor Stephen Hawking's latest theory on the creation of the world. My lecturer became instantaneously thrilled once Professor Hawking's name was mentioned. Actually, he proceeded to declare how awesome Professor Hawking was at his capacity to explain the creation of the world without acknowledging the occurrence of any supernatural force. Of course I thought this is absolute blasphemy and pitied my lecturer for what appeared to be atheism and his sure eternal damnation. It was not until following the class which i was repaid to my process and rules about judging others. I was reminded that it's not my obligation to decide on my lecturer's destiny though I am required to be a see.
In my estimation, ethics is a convoluted strategy that requires much emotional, religious and cognitive investment. I also believe the formation of my ethical principles has truly gone through and can proceed through several revolutions. The revolutions I forsee entail a strengthening of my present values. Certainly, it is expected that future vulnerability will likely hone the way in which I presently exhibit my beliefs and so I will possibly become more tactful whilst voicing my ideas. My ethical concepts have been shaped due alive experiences. WHENEVER I was much youthful, my ideas were probably more a function of fearing the 'belt' (outcomes) versus what was my inherent DUTY. With age, emotional, cognitive and religious maturity, I've progressed from a more concretized way of recognizing key points. The Bible speaks to allowing God to uncover Himself to us (1 Corinthians 2 verse 9-14; Life Software Research Bible, 1991) and in questioning certain things which range from the presence and 'development' of God to the importance of God's grace; the Lord has proven Himself if you ask me as a being who is worth my compliment. Thus, I really believe the fundamental framework, principles and guidelines that I subscribe to will remain with me at night until death.
I also know that my beliefs and values transcend every area of my entire life. Thus, whereas some people subscribe to the law of the land as the highest form of vitality; the regulations of my inventor supersede all others. Therefore, within my professional and personal life, the Trinity reigns supreme and can continue to influence the way in which I determine my ethics. Second Timothy 4 verse 16-17 notes "ALL scripture is God-breathed and is useful for coaching, rebuking, correcting and trained in righteousness so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for each and every good work (Life Application Research Bible, 1991).